| | | | | | |

A10 7700K vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 7700K is based on Steamroller architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7700K gets a score of 57.9 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.6 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
630f01
a0652
Core
Kaveri
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2+
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
21.38k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.89k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7700K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
15.65k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
7.99k
23.13k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
5.66k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
11.43k (x3.62)
TOTAL
21.38k
55.87k (x2.61)

Multithread

7700K

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.06k
26.77k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
43.81k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.44k
10.17k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
11.91k (x2.78)
TOTAL
57.89k
92.66k (x1.6)

Performance/W
7700K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
243 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
212 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
110 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
609 points/W
2059 points/W

Performance/GHz
7700K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1929 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2101 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
765 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
830 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
5625 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4