| | | | | | |

A10 5745M vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The 5745M is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
406f1
Core
Richland
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
25 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.08k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.11k points
237.83k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5745M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
6.04k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
5.63k
10.18k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
2.74k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.41k (x1.01)
TOTAL
17.08k
21.37k (x1.25)

Multithread

5745M

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.55k
47.51k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
75.12k (x5.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.75k
19.72k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
5.45k (x1.88)
TOTAL
37.11k
147.8k (x3.98)

Performance/W
5745M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
556 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1484 points/W
1739 points/W

Performance/GHz
5745M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2297 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1941 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
828 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
5889 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4