| | | | | | |

A10 5745M vs Core i7-7700HQ


Description
The 5745M is based on Piledriver architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 169.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 4.6 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
906e9
Core
Richland
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
25 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.08k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.11k points
208.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5745M
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
13k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
5.63k
20.34k (x3.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
4.77k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
6.95k (x2.91)
TOTAL
17.08k
45.05k (x2.64)

Multithread

5745M

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.55k
52.7k (x3.89)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
89.69k (x6.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.75k
22.49k (x3.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
4.3k (x1.48)
TOTAL
37.11k
169.17k (x4.56)

Performance/W
5745M
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
556 points/W
1993 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
1484 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
5745M
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2297 points/GHz
3421 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1941 points/GHz
5351 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
828 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
1829 points/GHz
TOTAL
5889 points/GHz
11857 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4