A10 5745M vs Core i3-7100U
Description
The 5745M is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.6 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.6 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
806e9
Core
Richland
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.08k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.11k points
79.6k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5745M
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
8.76k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
5.63k
13.49k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
3.21k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
3.9k (x1.63)
TOTAL
17.08k
29.36k (x1.72)
Multithread
5745M
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.55k
18.33k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
31.08k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.75k
7.5k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
3.61k (x1.24)
TOTAL
37.11k
60.52k (x1.63)
Performance/W
5745M
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
1222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
556 points/W
2072 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
240 points/W
TOTAL
1484 points/W
4035 points/W
Performance/GHz
5745M
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2297 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1941 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
828 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
1624 points/GHz
TOTAL
5889 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4