A10 5745M vs Core i3-3240
Description
The 5745M is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-3240 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1.3 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1.3 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
306a9
Core
Richland
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
25 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.08k points
24.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.11k points
49.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5745M
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
8.46k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
5.63k
10.69k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
3.09k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.23k (x0.93)
TOTAL
17.08k
24.48k (x1.43)
Multithread
5745M
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
13.55k
17.92k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
21.21k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.75k
7.77k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
2.8k (x0.96)
TOTAL
37.11k
49.7k (x1.34)
Performance/W
5745M
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
326 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
556 points/W
386 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
1484 points/W
904 points/W
Performance/GHz
5745M
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
2297 points/GHz
2490 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1941 points/GHz
3145 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
828 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
TOTAL
5889 points/GHz
7200 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4