A10 5745M vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 5745M is based on Piledriver architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 5.1 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 5.1 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
810f10
Core
Richland
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
17.08k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.11k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5745M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
13.04k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
5.63k
22.35k (x3.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
5.37k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
3.4k (x1.42)
TOTAL
17.08k
44.15k (x2.59)
Multithread
5745M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.55k
56.49k (x4.17)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
100.74k (x7.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.75k
28.21k (x4.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
3.04k (x1.05)
TOTAL
37.11k
188.49k (x5.08)
Performance/W
5745M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
556 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1484 points/W
2900 points/W
Performance/GHz
5745M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2297 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1941 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
828 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
5889 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4