A10 5745M vs Athlon 5150 APU
Description
The 5745M is based on Piledriver architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5745M is 1.2 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5745M is 1.2 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
700f01
Core
Richland
Kabini
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
AM1
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
25 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2013
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.08k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.11k points
30.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5745M
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
3.02k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
5.63k
2.62k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
1.59k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
1.02k (x0.43)
TOTAL
17.08k
8.26k (x0.48)
Multithread
5745M
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
13.55k
12.06k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
10.42k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.75k
6.32k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
1.26k (x0.43)
TOTAL
37.11k
30.06k (x0.81)
Performance/W
5745M
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
556 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1484 points/W
1203 points/W
Performance/GHz
5745M
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
2297 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1941 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
828 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
5889 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4