A10 5745M vs A6 9210
Description
The 5745M is based on Piledriver architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5745M is 1.4 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5745M gets a score of 37.1 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5745M is 1.4 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
670f00
Core
Richland
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FP2
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
May 2013
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.08k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.11k points
27.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5745M
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
4.71k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
5.63k
11.03k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
2.59k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.45k (x1.02)
TOTAL
17.08k
20.78k (x1.22)
Multithread
5745M
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
13.55k
8.43k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
12.8k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.75k
3.32k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.91k
2.59k (x0.89)
TOTAL
37.11k
27.13k (x0.73)
Performance/W
5745M
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
556 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
1484 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
5745M
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2297 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1941 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
828 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
5889 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4