| | | | | | |

Mobile 3020e vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.7 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
820f01
810f81
Core
Dali
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
140.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
10.88k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
18.09k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
4.29k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
3.36k (x1.63)
TOTAL
29.34k
36.64k (x1.25)

Multithread

3020e

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
42.44k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
73.82k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
20.76k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
3.96k (x1.83)
TOTAL
52.42k
140.97k (x2.69)

Performance/W
3020e
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
3020e
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4