| | | | | | |

Mobile 3020e vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.2 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
820f01
810f81
Core
Dali
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
11.13k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
19.38k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
4.47k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
3.87k (x1.88)
TOTAL
29.34k
38.85k (x1.32)

Multithread

3020e

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
17.13k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
30.56k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
9.44k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
4.09k (x1.89)
TOTAL
52.42k
61.23k (x1.17)

Performance/W
3020e
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
3020e
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4