Mobile 3020e vs A9 9420
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
670f00
Core
Dali
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
46.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
11.74k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
16.05k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.26k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
2.05k (x1)
TOTAL
29.34k
33.09k (x1.13)
Multithread
3020e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
18.57k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
20.11k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.27k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
2.38k (x1.1)
TOTAL
52.42k
46.33k (x0.88)
Performance/W
3020e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
3089 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4