Core i9-13900K vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1501.3 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.4 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1501.3 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.4 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
306e4
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
24/32
12 /24
TDP
125 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
132.34k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
1847.86k points
633.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
9.77k
3.44k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
24.52k
9.54k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.17k
4.21k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.37k
3.94k (x0.18)
TOTAL
72.83k
21.13k (x0.29)
Multithread
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
145.21k
73.17k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
444.95k
230.83k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318.3k
107.14k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.2k
7.99k (x0.29)
TOTAL
935.66k
419.12k (x0.45)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
31.93k
10.64k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
31.54k
9.53k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.8k
4.12k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.82k
3.62k (x0.17)
TOTAL
103.09k
27.91k (x0.27)
Multithread
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
522.07k
252.69k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
584.17k
238.68k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344.38k
115.5k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.36k
10.98k (x0.43)
TOTAL
1475.97k
617.84k (x0.42)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
31.8k
10.53k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
32.83k
9.98k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.37k
4k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.13k
3.4k (x0.16)
TOTAL
104.13k
27.92k (x0.27)
Multithread
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
532.97k
247.05k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
596.78k
264.43k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
342.96k
111.01k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.6k
10.66k (x0.37)
TOTAL
1501.31k
633.14k (x0.42)
Performance/W
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4264 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4774 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2744 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
229 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
12011 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5483 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5660 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3166 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3644 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
17953 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4