| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs i9-10900X


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1847.9 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.9 times faster than the i9-10900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
50657
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
24/32
10/20
TDP
125 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
19712 kB
Date
October 2022
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
132.34k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
1847.86k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
60.21k
25.97k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
33.14k
22.37k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
5.3k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.18k
8.63k (x0.41)
TOTAL
132.34k
62.28k (x0.47)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
861.66k
281.98k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
626.76k
259.01k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
334.12k
64.87k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.33k
26.5k (x1.05)
TOTAL
1847.86k
632.35k (x0.34)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6893 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5014 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2673 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
14783 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
10381 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3071 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3652 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
22818 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4