| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1847.9 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.3 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2022
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
132.34k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
1847.86k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-13900K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.77k
4.31k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
24.52k
17.51k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.17k
10.53k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.37k
23.57k (x1.1)
TOTAL
72.83k
55.92k (x0.77)

Multithread

i9-13900K

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
145.21k
24.18k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
444.95k
117.98k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318.3k
70.96k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.2k
8.08k (x0.3)
TOTAL
935.66k
221.19k (x0.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
60.21k
20.37k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
33.14k
22.52k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
10.18k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.18k
21.49k (x1.01)
TOTAL
132.34k
74.56k (x0.56)

Multithread

i9-13900K

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
861.66k
144.01k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
626.76k
191.86k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
334.12k
84.53k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.33k
6.5k (x0.26)
TOTAL
1847.86k
426.9k (x0.23)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6893 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5014 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2673 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
14783 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
10381 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3071 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3652 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
22818 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4