| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1847.9 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.3 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f82
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
132.34k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
1847.86k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-13900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.77k
4.25k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
24.52k
19.72k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.17k
5.84k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.37k
21.36k (x1)
TOTAL
72.83k
51.17k (x0.7)

Multithread

i9-13900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
145.21k
35.04k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
444.95k
181.42k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318.3k
64.86k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.2k
8.21k (x0.3)
TOTAL
935.66k
289.54k (x0.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-13900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.93k
15.22k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
31.54k
24.12k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.8k
5.87k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.82k
21k (x1.01)
TOTAL
103.09k
66.21k (x0.64)

Multithread

i9-13900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
522.07k
126.81k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
584.17k
229.86k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344.38k
61.74k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.36k
9.77k (x0.39)
TOTAL
1475.97k
428.19k (x0.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-13900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.8k
14.44k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
32.83k
24.92k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.37k
5.8k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.13k
19.07k (x0.9)
TOTAL
104.13k
64.24k (x0.62)

Multithread

i9-13900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
532.97k
122.01k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
596.78k
220.34k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
342.96k
59.89k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.6k
9.9k (x0.35)
TOTAL
1501.31k
412.13k (x0.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
60.21k
15.61k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
33.14k
26.08k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
5.84k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.18k
18.34k (x0.87)
TOTAL
132.34k
65.87k (x0.5)

Multithread

i9-13900K

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
861.66k
123.33k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
626.76k
240.46k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
334.12k
61.23k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.33k
8.17k (x0.32)
TOTAL
1847.86k
433.19k (x0.23)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6893 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5014 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2673 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
14783 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
10381 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3071 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3652 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
22818 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4