| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1847.9 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.5 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f11
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
132.34k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
1847.86k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-13900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
31.8k
13.95k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
32.83k
22.02k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.37k
5.17k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.13k
16.61k (x0.79)
TOTAL
104.13k
57.75k (x0.55)

Multithread

i9-13900K

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
532.97k
120.59k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
596.78k
197.34k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
342.96k
56.83k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.6k
6.41k (x0.22)
TOTAL
1501.31k
381.16k (x0.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
60.21k
12.65k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
33.14k
20.95k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
4.63k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.18k
14.47k (x0.68)
TOTAL
132.34k
52.69k (x0.4)

Multithread

i9-13900K

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
861.66k
101.78k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
626.76k
177.57k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
334.12k
47.18k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.33k
6.78k (x0.27)
TOTAL
1847.86k
333.31k (x0.18)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6893 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5014 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2673 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
14783 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
10381 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3071 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3652 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
22818 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4