Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 5 5600G
Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.1 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.1 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2022
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
345.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
22.16k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
24.46k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
10.71k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
22.44k (x1.15)
TOTAL
129.15k
79.76k (x0.62)
Multithread
i9-13900K
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
112.5k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
153.92k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
67.75k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
11.47k (x0.33)
TOTAL
1763.08k
345.64k (x0.2)
Performance/W
i9-13900K
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4