| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.5 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/24
10/20
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
November 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
35.87k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
31.43k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
7.34k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
15.73k (x0.88)
TOTAL
120.97k
90.37k (x0.75)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
377.56k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
347.59k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
88.08k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
12.24k (x0.49)
TOTAL
1219.33k
825.47k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4