| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs i5-10500H


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 3.2 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
378.99k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.96k
15.86k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
24.07k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.94k
5.94k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.14k
11.82k (x0.69)
TOTAL
93.05k
57.69k (x0.62)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
166.25k
97.37k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
172.03k
154.42k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.95k
38.76k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
55.78k
5.4k (x0.1)
TOTAL
491.01k
295.96k (x0.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
27.93k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
25.41k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
5.91k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
12.85k (x0.72)
TOTAL
120.97k
72.1k (x0.6)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
176.41k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
158.8k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
38.53k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
5.25k (x0.21)
TOTAL
1219.33k
378.99k (x0.31)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
2714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
5831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
6207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
16023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4