| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 3 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
410.47k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.96k
15.11k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
23.46k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.94k
5.64k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.14k
17.52k (x1.02)
TOTAL
93.05k
61.72k (x0.66)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
166.25k
119.5k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
172.03k
198.79k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.95k
59.75k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
55.78k
11.58k (x0.21)
TOTAL
491.01k
389.62k (x0.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
15.02k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
24.26k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
5.53k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
16.26k (x0.91)
TOTAL
120.97k
61.07k (x0.5)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
122.92k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
220.32k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
59.78k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
7.44k (x0.3)
TOTAL
1219.33k
410.47k (x0.34)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4