Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 7 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 7 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
14.63k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
24.09k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
5.51k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
15.86k (x0.89)
TOTAL
120.97k
60.09k (x0.5)
Multithread
i9-12900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
48.75k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
80.1k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
24.5k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
19.85k (x0.8)
TOTAL
1219.33k
173.2k (x0.14)
Performance/W
i9-12900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4