| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs i9-11900K


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the i9-11900K gets 788.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.5 times faster than the i9-11900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a0671
Core
Alder Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16386 kB
Date
November 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
106.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
788.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
38.06k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
31.54k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
13.5k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
23.3k (x1.31)
TOTAL
120.97k
106.41k (x0.88)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
327.93k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
329.16k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
118.88k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
12.98k (x0.52)
TOTAL
1219.33k
788.94k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
2623 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2633 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
951 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
6312 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
7182 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
4397 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
20077 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4