| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 237.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 5.1 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
16/24
4/8
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
68.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
237.55k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
28.96k
15.12k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
23.4k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.94k
10.9k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.14k
9.41k (x0.55)
TOTAL
93.05k
58.83k (x0.63)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
166.25k
45.69k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
172.03k
74.42k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.95k
29.8k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
55.78k
7.16k (x0.13)
TOTAL
491.01k
157.08k (x0.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
25.91k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
23.39k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
10.08k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
8.7k (x0.49)
TOTAL
120.97k
68.08k (x0.56)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
94.51k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
99.21k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
33.35k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
10.47k (x0.42)
TOTAL
1219.33k
237.55k (x0.19)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
3375 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
3543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
374 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
8484 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
6169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
2401 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
2071 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
16210 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4