Core i9-12900K vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The i9-12900K is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900K gets a score of 1131.6 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900K gets a score of 1131.6 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
800f11
Core
Alder Lake
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
241 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
109.05k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
1131.59k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.92k
13.72k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
30.1k
22.48k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
5.12k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.38k
15.44k (x1)
TOTAL
109.05k
56.76k (x0.52)
Multithread
i9-12900K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
502.11k
110.92k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
414.67k
200.56k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
192.52k
54.24k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.3k
7.01k (x0.31)
TOTAL
1131.59k
372.73k (x0.33)
Performance/W
i9-12900K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2083 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1721 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
799 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
4695 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-12900K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9216 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5789 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3009 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2957 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
20971 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4