| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
10/20
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
35.87k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
31.43k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
7.34k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
15.73k (x1.19)
TOTAL
91.45k
90.37k (x0.99)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
377.56k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
347.59k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
88.08k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
12.24k (x0.76)
TOTAL
468.3k
825.47k (x1.76)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4