Core i7-1280P vs i5-10400F
Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
28.39k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
24.89k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
5.78k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
13.19k (x1)
TOTAL
91.45k
72.25k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-1280P
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
180.2k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
163.51k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
40.6k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
6.48k (x0.4)
TOTAL
468.3k
390.78k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i7-1280P
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4