| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i5-10300H


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.76k
15.65k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
23.13k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.64k
5.66k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
11.43k (x0.86)
TOTAL
73.92k
55.87k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
149.83k
26.77k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
170.43k
43.81k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.32k
10.17k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.67k
11.91k (x0.76)
TOTAL
419.25k
92.66k (x0.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
27.14k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
24.75k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
5.73k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
11.84k (x0.9)
TOTAL
91.45k
69.47k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
105.77k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
107.47k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
24.82k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
8.02k (x0.5)
TOTAL
468.3k
246.07k (x0.53)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4