| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.6 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-P
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1280P
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6.94k
3.41k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
15.96k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.27k
4.69k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
17.42k (x1.28)
TOTAL
50.27k
41.47k (x0.82)

Multithread

i7-1280P

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
44.01k
20.88k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
125.05k
110.37k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76.28k
39.25k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
6.66k (x0.43)
TOTAL
260.85k
177.16k (x0.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
13.76k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
23.03k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
5.12k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
15.23k (x1.16)
TOTAL
91.45k
57.13k (x0.62)

Multithread

i7-1280P

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
83.23k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
161.06k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
40.52k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
6.73k (x0.42)
TOTAL
468.3k
291.53k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4