Core i7-1280P vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.7 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.7 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-P
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
13.67k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
22.28k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
4.99k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
15.22k (x1.16)
TOTAL
91.45k
56.16k (x0.61)
Multithread
i7-1280P
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
81.03k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
145.84k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
39.14k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
6.79k (x0.42)
TOTAL
468.3k
272.8k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i7-1280P
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4