| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i9-11900H


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
806d1
Core
Alder Lake-P
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
33.38k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
27.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
11.69k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
17k (x1.29)
TOTAL
91.45k
89.19k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
249.83k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
237.26k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
84.18k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
13.2k (x0.82)
TOTAL
468.3k
584.47k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4