| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs i5-10200H


Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/8
TDP
115 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
260.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
26.37k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
23.91k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
5.57k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
11.68k (x0.91)
TOTAL
93.12k
67.53k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-12700H

i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
114.08k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
114.71k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
27.33k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
4.25k (x0.4)
TOTAL
643.29k
260.38k (x0.4)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
7439 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4