| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 3.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
810f10
Core
Alder Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/8
TDP
115 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-12700H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.95k
3.8k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
19.74k
17.38k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.29k
5.17k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.97k
3.16k (x0.21)
TOTAL
55.95k
29.52k (x0.53)

Multithread

i7-12700H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
53.64k
15.28k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
171.15k
76.44k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.92k
27.48k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.24k
3.02k (x0.33)
TOTAL
328.95k
122.2k (x0.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-12700H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.26k
13.95k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.03k
20.7k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
5.33k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.08k
3.03k (x0.25)
TOTAL
75.12k
43.01k (x0.57)

Multithread

i7-12700H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
199.99k
58.56k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
218.01k
92.95k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.62k
28.55k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.42k
2.98k (x0.32)
TOTAL
530.04k
183.04k (x0.35)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-12700H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
13.04k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
22.35k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
5.37k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
3.4k (x0.24)
TOTAL
80.58k
44.15k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-12700H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
203.61k
56.49k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
249.64k
100.74k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101.32k
28.21k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
3.04k (x0.32)
TOTAL
564.12k
188.49k (x0.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
14.2k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
23.23k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
5.35k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
5.18k (x0.4)
TOTAL
93.12k
47.96k (x0.52)

Multithread

i7-12700H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
58.24k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
105.72k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
28.73k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
5.59k (x0.53)
TOTAL
643.29k
198.27k (x0.31)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4