Core i7-12700 vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700 gets a score of 698.3 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-12700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700 gets a score of 698.3 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-12700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a20f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/20
12/24
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+4x2048 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
November 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
104.01k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
698.34k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.39k
24.34k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
26.92k
26.8k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
12.12k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
26.55k (x1.73)
TOTAL
104.01k
89.82k (x0.86)
Multithread
i7-12700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
415.67k
263.12k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
158.57k
353.9k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.37k
159.07k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
64.01k (x4.35)
TOTAL
698.34k
840.11k (x1.2)
Performance/W
i7-12700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6395 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2440 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1683 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
226 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
10744 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
9876 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5493 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2728 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3131 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
21227 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4