Core i7-12700 vs Ryzen 7 4800U
Description
The i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4800U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700 gets a score of 698.3 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 2 times faster than the 4800U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700 gets a score of 698.3 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 2 times faster than the 4800U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
12/20
8/16
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+4x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
November 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
104.01k points
57.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
698.34k points
356.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.39k
16.53k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
26.92k
24.67k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
9.04k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
7.68k (x0.5)
TOTAL
104.01k
57.92k (x0.56)
Multithread
i7-12700
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
415.67k
121.96k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
158.57k
162.82k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.37k
68.25k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
3.79k (x0.26)
TOTAL
698.34k
356.81k (x0.51)
Performance/W
i7-12700
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
6395 points/W
8131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2440 points/W
10854 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1683 points/W
4550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
226 points/W
252 points/W
TOTAL
10744 points/W
23788 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
9876 points/GHz
3936 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5493 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2728 points/GHz
2153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3131 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
21227 points/GHz
13790 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4