| | | | | | |

Core i7-1260P vs i7-10750H


Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
349.21k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
29.06k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
26.49k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
6.23k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
13.89k (x1.03)
TOTAL
94.9k
75.67k (x0.8)

Multithread

i7-1260P

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
154.61k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
151.34k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
36.33k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
6.93k (x0.47)
TOTAL
391.07k
349.21k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i7-1260P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4