| | | | | | |

Core i7-1260P vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16386 kB
Date
February 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
390.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
28.39k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
24.89k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
5.78k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
13.19k (x0.98)
TOTAL
94.9k
72.25k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-1260P

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
180.2k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
163.51k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
40.6k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
6.48k (x0.44)
TOTAL
391.07k
390.78k (x1)

Performance/W
i7-1260P
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
6012 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4