Core i7-1260P vs i5-10400
Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
68.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
372.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
26.43k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
23.89k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
5.63k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
12.1k (x0.9)
TOTAL
94.9k
68.04k (x0.72)
Multithread
i7-1260P
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
163.14k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
161.5k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
39.94k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
7.6k (x0.52)
TOTAL
391.07k
372.19k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i7-1260P
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
2510 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
117 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
5726 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
6146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5555 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
2814 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
15824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4