Core i7-1260P vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-P
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
32768 kB
Date
February 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
497.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
17.1k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
26.59k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
8.91k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
23.21k (x1.72)
TOTAL
94.9k
75.81k (x0.8)
Multithread
i7-1260P
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
172.04k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
214.03k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
97.1k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
14.57k (x1)
TOTAL
391.07k
497.74k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i7-1260P
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4