Core i7-1260P vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-P
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
13.72k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
22.48k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
5.12k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
15.44k (x1.14)
TOTAL
94.9k
56.76k (x0.6)
Multithread
i7-1260P
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
110.92k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
200.56k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
54.24k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
7.01k (x0.48)
TOTAL
391.07k
372.73k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i7-1260P
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4