| | | | | | |

Core i7-1260P vs i9-12900K


Description
Both models i7-1260P and i9-12900K are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i9-12900K gets 1131.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 2.9 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
90672
Core
Alder Lake-P
Alder Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/16
16/24
TDP
28 W
241 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
30720 kB
Date
February 2022
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
109.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
1131.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
47.92k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
30.1k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
15.65k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
15.38k (x1.14)
TOTAL
94.9k
109.05k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-1260P

i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
502.11k (x2.99)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
414.67k (x2.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
192.52k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
22.3k (x1.53)
TOTAL
391.07k
1131.59k (x2.89)

Performance/W
i7-1260P
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
2083 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
1721 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
799 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
4695 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
9216 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5789 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
3009 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
2957 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
20971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4