Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
406f1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/28
TDP
117 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
35840 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
17.8k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
16.51k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.47k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
2.56k (x0.22)
TOTAL
76.46k
41.35k (x0.54)
Multithread
i5-12400F
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
494.82k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
514.13k (x3.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
132.87k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
20.8k (x1.09)
TOTAL
399.39k
1162.63k (x2.91)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4