Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
117 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
3.52k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
8.68k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
2.83k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
3.13k (x0.21)
TOTAL
54.04k
18.17k (x0.34)
Multithread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
32.7k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
105.18k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
35.18k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
9.54k (x0.57)
TOTAL
271.76k
182.59k (x0.67)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
11.08k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
9.57k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
3.18k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
3.28k (x0.22)
TOTAL
77.32k
27.11k (x0.35)
Multithread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
139.07k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
133.47k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
46.6k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
6.65k (x0.41)
TOTAL
404.19k
325.78k (x0.81)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
11.18k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
10.06k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
3.21k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
3.12k (x0.22)
TOTAL
77.41k
27.57k (x0.36)
Multithread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
140.98k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
145.37k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
45.62k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
6.75k (x0.44)
TOTAL
421.18k
338.73k (x0.8)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
18.62k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
10.49k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.04k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
3.26k (x0.28)
TOTAL
76.46k
36.41k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
236.25k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
151.05k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
58.9k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
6.7k (x0.35)
TOTAL
399.39k
452.9k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4