| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
13.1k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
11.91k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
4.83k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
3.83k (x0.26)
TOTAL
77.41k
33.68k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-12400F

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
105.42k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
109.99k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
44.56k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
17.7k (x1.15)
TOTAL
421.18k
277.66k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
20.99k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
11.9k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.72k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
3.75k (x0.32)
TOTAL
76.46k
41.36k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-12400F

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
172.62k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
110.03k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
44.06k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
16.93k (x0.89)
TOTAL
399.39k
343.64k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4