| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-4720HQ


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 132.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
306c3
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
132.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
3.79k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
9.64k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
4.34k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
3.76k (x0.25)
TOTAL
54.04k
21.53k (x0.4)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
11.66k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
37.71k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
16.38k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
5.94k (x0.36)
TOTAL
271.76k
71.69k (x0.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
20.68k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
10.28k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.87k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
4.29k (x0.36)
TOTAL
76.46k
40.12k (x0.52)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
66.84k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
42.85k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
16.77k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
5.88k (x0.31)
TOTAL
399.39k
132.35k (x0.33)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1422 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
357 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5745 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
11143 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4