| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i5-8300H


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.2 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
182.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
23.6k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
21.72k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.61k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
6.8k (x0.58)
TOTAL
76.46k
56.72k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
79.12k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
81.27k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
17.46k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
4.62k (x0.24)
TOTAL
399.39k
182.47k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
4055 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4