Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
15.48k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
22.82k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
8.63k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
7.17k (x0.61)
TOTAL
76.46k
54.11k (x0.71)
Multithread
i5-12400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
117.98k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
146.43k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
65.54k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
4.77k (x0.25)
TOTAL
399.39k
334.72k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4