Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.8 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.8 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
117 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
13.25k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
21.67k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.79k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
3.98k (x0.34)
TOTAL
76.46k
43.7k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-12400F
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
46.47k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
78.38k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
16.69k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
3.3k (x0.17)
TOTAL
399.39k
144.84k (x0.36)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4