| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 4.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
117 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
13.02k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
20.56k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.81k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
5.43k (x0.46)
TOTAL
76.46k
43.82k (x0.57)

Multithread

i5-12400F

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
27.29k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
49.37k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
13.57k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
5.61k (x0.3)
TOTAL
399.39k
95.84k (x0.24)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4