Core i5-12400F vs A10 9630P
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 9630P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 12.1 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 12.1 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
660f51
Core
Alder Lake-S
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2022
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
23.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
32.92k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
8.52k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
11.04k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
2.36k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
1.79k (x0.15)
TOTAL
76.46k
23.7k (x0.31)
Multithread
i5-12400F
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
12.83k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
14.44k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
3.6k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
2.05k (x0.11)
TOTAL
399.39k
32.92k (x0.08)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
285 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
321 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
732 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
2582 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
543 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
7183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4