| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806c2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.57k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
17.21k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
9.97k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
14.98k (x1.01)
TOTAL
54.04k
46.75k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
12.75k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
45.98k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
27.86k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
20.06k (x1.2)
TOTAL
271.76k
106.66k (x0.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
30.89k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.57k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.64k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
15.66k (x1.33)
TOTAL
76.46k
82.77k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
96.34k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
95.75k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
32.29k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
15.2k (x0.8)
TOTAL
399.39k
239.58k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4